Ethics and culture are closely related. Culture determines how we perceive and understand moral concerns, shaping our sense of morality and ethical action. What is deemed cultural norms and values frequently determine acceptable or inappropriate behavior and these norms and values can differ greatly from one society to another. In this way, ethics can shape culture and be shaped by it.
A group's culture is its unwritten shared ideals, standards, beliefs, and practices. Because cultural artifacts are produced by people who live in the same social milieu, culture is frequently a social phenomenon. A group of people who live in a specific location shares a culture, collective programming of the society's thought system that separates humans from other populations in more general terms throughout the same period and is a reasonably permanent system of meanings. These programs change depending on the type of social groups that emerge.
There are three essential ethical principles in response to culture −
Applying the first principle in the context of the patient-physician relationship leads to the idea that for doctors and patients to communicate effectively, practitioners must comprehend the broad impact of cultural influences on their patients' lives. This kind and inclusive view of medical care is founded on close, personal involvement. Clinicians must fully comprehend their patients to ensure that they deliver high-quality care. The aim of cultural competence is never the detached mastery of individual cultures. Instead, the doctor's primary goal in being familiar with the cultures of his or her patients is to build understanding and better working relationships with each patient.
Providers must become at ease with patient autonomy to appreciate the cultural variations seen in clinical practice. Physicians have occasionally been reluctant to approve cultural practices that disagree with conventional medical wisdom.
Healthcare professionals must have a fundamentally pluralistic perspective that recognizes cultural diversity to uphold the concept of appreciating other cultures. Clinicians might avoid presuming that all patients share their viewpoints by practicing pluralism, which allows for various opinions. Successful pluralism requires participants to be sufficiently self-aware and secure in their viewpoints to not feel frightened by opposing viewpoints. For many people, the period of medical training is one of moral ambiguity. Pluralism may be difficult to grasp because medical students acclimate to doctors' cultures at varying rates. The student's investigation of pluralism may be aided by explicit knowledge of the medical community as a doctor's culture, which is a crucial component of cultural competence education.
The principles of cultural competence demand that medical professionals change their procedures to promote better medical care. The responsibility of adapting should never fall on the patients. Without accommodations, many patients who, for instance, do not understand English will not be able to get high-quality medical care. Clinicians must plan to prevent their patients from always bearing the health and social weight of being different if they are to deliver culturally competent care. Language limitations are a prime example, but accommodations have numerous, intricate effects and need for adaptability and continual learning. It takes extra work to ensure culturally acceptable solutions are available when people from various origins navigate the healthcare system.
Additionally, it is necessary to transmit a tried-and-true system for allowing exceptions. This can be a time-consuming and costly operation. It considers the nuances of diversity to create a welcoming environment for people from diverse cultures in an institution. It may be necessary to change things like diet and architecture, color schemes, and even how people conceptualize time or the concept of reason to create a culturally competent healthcare setting. The discovery of differences in health outcomes should set off a series of actions to identify the obstacles patients face and the accommodations required to lessen the health burden caused by cultural differences. The spectrum of necessary corrective measures should be examined in this evaluation, from eliminating open bias to discussing health attitudes and negotiating a common treatment model.
Since ethics are a component of culture, it is unrealistic to analyze ethical decisions without expressly considering the cultural environment. Not only are moral values socially and culturally constructed, but there are also cultural differences in social roles, gender roles, institutional structures, welfare expectations, laws, and traditional rights, privileges, and obligations. As a result, different cultural responses to consumption practices are to be expected. In other words, culture shapes our ideas of ethical or responsible consumption and the repercussions of transgressing these moral standards. Determining what constitutes an ethical violation in the first place would vary substantially depending on cultural orientation because there are different perceptions of what is good for the individual and what is good for society.
Ethics and culture are closely related to providing mental health care. Understanding, sensitivity, and empathy for the patient as a unique individual, including his or her cultural values and beliefs, are necessary for ethical practice. The ultimate objective of providing more advantages of mental health care to more people is advanced by the culturally sensitive practice of medicine, which promotes wider access to care, a more inviting "patient experience," and more effective health care delivery. This is how cultural competency exemplifies the cornerstones of contemporary biomedical ethics: respect for humans, beneficence (doing good), nonmaleficence (not doing damage), and justice (treating people fairly). "Ethics" and "culture" are interwoven as theoretical ideas.
Moral goals and values, a byproduct of human culture, are expressed in ethical principles. Since values are culturally mediated, physicians' considerations in the face of morally troubling clinical situations are, in part, products of their individual cultural development and cultural history and may reflect values that differ from those of their patients. Mental health workers are immersed in "health care culture," the customs and values that shape modern mental health practice, and their cultural heritage. Since it is somewhat strange to many patients, this culture is crucial in determining how a clinician develops ethical principles.
Even if culture considerably influences how people perceive morality, more is needed to fully account for the reasons behind the various behaviors people display in identical conditions. The association between these two notions depends on an individual's level of integration. In addition, individualistic factors like age, sex, religion, and others affect people's views of and attitudes toward ethics.