Our health is unique to ourselves and thus formidably impossible to affect the larger mass. However, an intriguing relationship does exist. By improving people's health and expanding their access to medical care, we can help build stronger communities and foster lasting peace on a global scale. The idea highlights the significance of addressing health as a vital feature of development & peacebuilding efforts, acknowledging the strong correlation between health and other significant well-being factors such as education, employment, and security.
Although both health and illness are connected to conflict and violence, the reverse is also true. There are many positive and negative parallels between the definitions of peace and health when viewed as human rights, at least for children, in terms of their determinants or strategies of promotion. When war and violence are absent from a society, that society is said to be at peace. Standard societal definitions of peace include the absence of hostilities (like war) and the absence of apprehension of physical harm from others.
A state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being is what the World Health Organization (WHO) means by "health." Countries' commitment to "Health for all by the Year 2000" was reiterated at the 1978 Alma Ata Conference. In what became called the Ottawa Charter in 1986, public health experts and health promoters identified the most critical conditions and resources for health as (in this order): safety, security, education, money, food, a healthy environment, renewable resources, fairness, and equity.
It is not only that "peace" is listed first among the requirements necessary to ensure a "safe foundation" for health; war also negatively impacts other conditions. Successive public health and health promotion initiatives (like the People's Health Charter 2000 and the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDG) have placed some emphasis on reducing systemic violence and eco-system damage and improving social cohesion and human rights to promote health. The takeaway is clear, if we want to make a real difference in our patient's health, we need to eliminate interpersonal and institutional violence.
Can medical professionals do something to lessen the blows violence deals and assist in building peace? That's what the Oslo-based Peace Prize Committee thinks. Its first Prize was given in 1901 to Henri Dunant, the Swiss who established the Red Cross. Dunant, a Swiss businessman, was honored for his work in creating the medical aid organization and the first of the Geneva Conventions, which established standards for treating soldiers and governed the conduct of war.
Since then, in 1917, 1944, and 1963, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has been honored with the Nobel Peace Prize. Also, groups like International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (1985) and Médecins sans Frontiers (1954), as well as individuals like Albert Schweitzer (1952), have won the award (1999). To stigmatize Peace Through Health, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (1997) triumphed by emphasizing the health risks associated with weapons.
The concept of "peace through health" stems from recognizing that one's emotional and physical well-being intertwines to foster contentment and contentment. Taking care of one's health improves one's quality of life and decreases emotional and mental strain. From a psychological perspective, this involves encouraging good mental health through meditation, stress reduction, and doing what makes one happy. Health is the bedrock upon which we can build a life of contentment and joy.
Peace through Health is a novel concept in the field of study, although many countries have already begun educating their populations about it. Domestic violence and suicide are just two examples of the micro- and macro-level forms of violence covered in the World Health Organization's report. Even while community violence, family violence, and self-violence are interconnected, Peace through Health practitioners has traditionally decided to focus interventions on direct macro-level violence.
However, academics in Norway, Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom consider health sector action's potential to increase human security and ameliorate structural (including poverty, starvation, and illiteracy) and ecological violence in their studies. Peace through Health focuses on interventions rather than studying causes and effects; while its projects are typically on a micro-level (individual or interpersonal), its goal is to reduce macro-levels of violence.
The concept of "peace through health" is based on the premise that people's physical and mental well-being is vital to maintaining social harmony. The idea stems from the conviction that a healthy population makes for a happier and safer society and that individuals can only achieve their full potential when physically and mentally fit.
Investing in healthcare is the right thing to do from a humanitarian standpoint and makes for a more peaceful world. A person's ability to participate in their community's social, economic, and political life improves when they have access to high-quality health care, and their health-related concerns are addressed. This helps alleviate poverty, boost the economy, and create a more peaceful political climate.
Poverty, inequality, and social injustice are some of the core causes of conflict, and health efforts can assist in alleviating these issues. Increasing opportunities for peace and stability include ensuring that all people, especially women, and girls, have access to quality education and healthcare. More than that, worldwide cooperation and coordination are necessary to handle global health concerns like pandemics. Cooperation of this sort aids in making connections between nations and bolsters ties, ultimately contributing to a more peaceful global community.
Yet, as healthcare professionals, can we genuinely contribute to minimise the impacts of violence and build circumstances for peace? The Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Oslo appears to agree. The inaugural Award was given to Henri Dunant, the founder of the Swiss Red Cross, in 1901. Dunant, a Swiss businessman, received the award not only for creating the medical assistance organisation, but also for developing the first of the Geneva Conventions, which governed the rules of war and combatant treatment. Since then, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has received the Nobel Peace Prize three times: in 1917, 1944, and 1963.
Individuals such as Albert Schweitzer (1952), who won for his work at Gabon's Lambaréné Hospital, and organisations such as International Doctors for the Prevention of Nuclear War (1985) and Médecins Sans Frontières (1991) have also received the award (1999).
The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (1997) succeeded with a medical message - to stigmatise a weapon system because to its disproportionate impact on civilian non-combatants. Nonetheless, many of the peace studies community is unaware of the health sector's role in peace-making and peace-building. Joseph Montville and Louise Diamond do not even consider health as a sector to assist promote peaceful settings in their multi-track diplomacy model. Examine some of the efforts in the health industry to promote peace.
Several medical groups in the Western world have opposed the two major wars of this millennium, both led by the United States. For example, on Afghanistan in the immediate wake of September 11, was viewed as perhaps 'right' or legitimate by many campaigners, but stupid and not a final choice. Delegates to the inaugural Peace through Health Conference demanded that military action cease immediately following the American invasion.
The American Public Health Association, backed by New York City Department of Health officials, likewise rejected a military response to the World Trade Center attacks. Four years later, the war continues: Afghan President Karzai is unable to travel outside of Kabul without US military escort, fundamentalists and warlords often rule the rest of the country, women have few more rights than under the Taliban, the opium trade has resumed, and cluster bomblets continue to maim children.
As we have seen, peace through health is a potent notion acknowledging the importance of good health in supporting peace and stability. Health investment leads to a more just and peaceful society where people can live their best lives and flourish in their communities. It is an admirable goal that needs the support of people, organizations, and governments everywhere if it is going to become a reality.
Physics
Biology
Chemistry
Mathematics
Economics
Psychology
Environmental Science
Social Studies
Fashion Studies
English