Biographies, as written histories, are rich sources for personality portraits. Harṣavardhana ruled approximately 300 years after Samudragupta; his biography was authored by court poet, Bāṇabhaṭṭa; it is known as the Harṣacharita, or the deeds of Harṣa.
Images Coming soon
Bāṇabhaṭṭa is one of the greatest poets of India. He was born in Pritikuta, on the shores of river Hiranyavahu. The area where Bāṇabhaṭṭa was born is called Chhapra today.
He was born a Brahmin, to Chitrabhanu and Rajadevi; the family belonged to Vatsyayana Gotra. The family didn’t have much money but Bāṇabhaṭṭa was a clever and precocious child. He was a stellar student and demonstrated immense discipline with his schoolwork.
His father was a highly learned poet, and due to this influence, Bāṇabhaṭṭa went on to carve a legacy for himself as one of the greatest poets in India, being an integral part of the court of Harṣavardhana of Kannauj.
He became the Asthana Kavi at the court of King Harṣa who ruled from 606-647 AD beginning from the region of Sthanishvara and later on, Kanauj. In addition to the Harshcharita (“The Deeds of Harṣa”) he worked on one of the world’s preliminary novels, “Kadambari”.
Images Coming soon
The genealogy of Harṣa is greatly disputed by historians, and they have put forth theories on his origins. Bhim Singh Dahiya and Thakur Deshraj, state Harṣa belonged to the Virk clan. The Virk clan is native to the Virks of Mandsaur.
Other historians such as Carlyle and Alexander Cunningham, and Dilip Singh Ahlawat, claim he belonged to the Bain clan.
The Bains clan is connected to Punjab. Other historians claim that Harṣa hailed from the royal family of Thaneswar who belonged to the Bhatti gotra.
Bhattis, Bains, and Virks, all fall under the Jats.
Harṣa, referred to as Harṣavardhana, lived from 590 to 647. He was the second born of Prabakara Vardhana, of the Pushyabhuti Dynasty, and he had an elder brother, and a younger sister.
Images Coming soon
As per tradition, upon his father’s passing, his brother Rajya Vardhana ascended the throne. Prior to his father’s death, Rajyasri had been married off to Grahavarman, a Maukhari. They were a prominent, powerful, and ruling family in the city of Kannauj.
Harṣa’s rise to power was a road fraught with personal tragedy. His brother-in-law, Grahavarman was killed by a Malava who kidnapped his sister. His elder brother took to war against the Malava King, but was killed in a sinister fashion by Shashanka, a Gauda ruler. His sister escaped to the Vindhya forests, but her fate remained unknown.
After the fall of the Guptas, a strong ruler was the need of the hour. Several kingdoms less significant than the Guptas were engaged in a battle for power in a time of political strife and confusion. There was no clear ruler who could take the reins and lead Northern India forward, and in this backdrop, Harṣa ascended the throne his brother had left, with much anger and sadness.
Much like King Asoka, he was a convert to Buddhism, in an age dominated by Hinduism; Harṣa himself was a devotee of Lord Shiva, prior. Harṣa’s father, Prabhakara Vardhana, and his siblings, Rajyasri, and Rajya Vardhana were staunch followers of Himayana Buddhism.
This is speculated to have prompted Harṣa’s conversion to Mahayana Buddhism. What is noteworthy is that he banned animal slaughter in his kingdom, and established an innumerable number of Buddhist monasteries all over his kingdom.
Harṣa was known as Maharaja Adhiraja, having vanquished rulers of smaller states, he consolidated them into his empire and called himself the “Supreme Ruler.” Harṣa’s self-coronation demonstrates his individualism, and his go-getter attitude, something that was much ahead of its time.
Harṣa made several tactical decisions, and one of them was to provide his empire with its own unique identity. His kingdom’s capital was Patliputra, but he shifted this to Kannauj.
Images Coming soon
Patliputra was the capital of both the Guptas and the Mauryans, and Harṣa’s individualism can be seen here, much like his conversion to Buddhism – he didn’t want to be one among the masses, and he didn’t want his empire to be lost in the shuffle by sharing a capital.
Harṣa took over various regions ranging from Punjab, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Odisha, Bengal, and the totality of the Indo-Gangetic plain north of the Narmada into his fold. This success, however, did not help him in making an impact in the southern regions of India. Harṣa was a diplomatic and democratic ruler who had a sympathetic stance towards the disenfranchised populace. In addition to several Buddhist monasteries, he made it a point to open a lot of rest houses throughout his empire for the poor, providing them with shelter, medicine, and food.
He didn’t look at them as a burden, and he didn’t believe they owed him anything. Even further, he didn’t consider himself to be above his citizens, often touring his kingdom to observe how his subjects were coping with life – he took a hands-on approach to public welfare, even though he was very privileged and had a good lot in life.
The economy thrived, and was increasingly self-sufficient, with Kannauj becoming a trade hotbed. There was eventually a decline in commerce and a shift towards an agrarian economy, but Harṣa’s moral integrity and unwillingness to turn his back on his subjects became the fibre that held the empire together.
Bāṇabhaṭṭa labels his work an akhyayika (a tale, or tradition) due to its basis in history. It is composed of eight ucchavasas, which literally means “breathing out”, and is like the modern concept of a ‘chapter’.
Bāṇabhaṭṭa’s work is compelling as it provides an accurate historical portrait of the socioeconomic and political conditions of the time, in addition to insight on Harṣa himself. Bana strays away from inauthentic praise, and salacious exaggeration, instead focusing on the facts – something sorely absent today. While undoubtedly a work beautified by Bana, it presents a neutral portrait of a man, a kingdom, and its people.
Q1. Who was Bāṇabhaṭṭa?
Ans. Bāṇabhaṭṭa was the court poet of Harṣa.
Q2. Why did Harṣa change his kingdom’s capital from Patliputra to Kannauj?
Ans. He wanted his kingdom to have a unique identity, as Patliputra was the shared capital of the Gupta and the Mauryans.
Q3. Why did Harṣa ascend the throne?
Ans. His elder brother was slain by an ally of the Malava who had kidnapped their sister. Due to his death, Harṣa became king.
Q4. What was King Harṣa’s religion?
Ans. He was a Mahayana Buddhist.
Q5. Was Harṣa a just and kind ruler?
Ans. Yes, he established several rest houses for the poor to clothe, feed, and shelter them.
Physics
Biology
Chemistry
Mathematics
Economics
Psychology
Environmental Science
Social Studies
Fashion Studies
English